Share

Feedback

Research Outputs

Get an overview about the publications and related data

A stakeholder’s evaluation of collaborative processes for maintaining multi-functional floodplains: a Dutch case study

View publication

Published on 30/01/2017 by Fliervoet, J. M., van den Born, R. J. G., & Meijerink, S. V.

Contact details

Jan Fliervoet

Radboud University Nijmegen

Analytical framework: a simplification of the collaborative governance model (starting conditions, collaborative process and outcomes) combined with two levels of collaborative partnerships. The stakeholder’s lessons learned are presented by the broken circles and lines and refer to the three processes: (1) the Coordination Council, (2) the Stewardship, and (3) their interaction. (Source: Figure 1 from Fliervoet et al, 2017)

Abstract

All over the world, governments have established integrated river basin management projects on local and regional scales to combine functions, such as flood protection, nature restoration, and other potentially conflicting land uses (e.g. recreational and agricultural activities). This has led to collaborative arrangements between diverse administrative levels, sectors and actors in the planning and implementation phase. Following the finalization of the implementation phase, a new floodplain maintenance phase is called for. Maintaining multi-functional floodplains involves, for example, monitoring, the development of ecological infrastructure and the coordination of maintenance activities. This paper addresses how collaborative processes continue and are further shaped in the maintenance phase. Regional stakeholder’s frames were examined with respect to the following components: incentives, collaborative process, allocation of tasks including related responsibilities, and outcomes. Analysis of an unsuccessful case study indicates that the collaborative processes on the organizational and action levels were insufficiently connected, because of the lack of a strategy to integrate the outcomes of both processes. Moreover, underlying conflicting perspectives on collaborative maintenance, an economic perspective versus a perspective of collaboration with a platform of local nature organizations, obstructed effective collaborative governance aimed at maintaining multi-functional floodplains.

Distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).

Resources

 

Journal publication

Fliervoet, J. M., van den Born, R. J. G., & Meijerink, S. V. (2017). A stakeholder’s evaluation of collaborative processes for maintaining multi-functional floodplains: a Dutch case study. International Journal of River Basin Management, 15(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2017.1295384

 

Replication dataset

This replication dataset contains the data of the the flume experiment and the Matlab scripts to process line laser scanner data and to perform statistical analysis. https://dataverse.nl/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:10411/YACJ6D.

Related outputs

Analyzing Collaborative Governance Through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study of River Management Along the Waal River in The Netherlands

We charted the current interorganizational relationships between organizations involved in flood protection and nature management and explored the consequences of abolishing the central actor in these networks.

01/09/2015 by Jan Fliervoet et al.

View output View publication

Contains: Dataset upon request

From implementation towards maintenance: sustaining collaborative initiatives for integrated floodplain management in the Netherlands

this article explores how stakeholders shape collaborative initiatives aimed at maintaining multifunctional floodplains.

06/07/2016 by Jan Fliervoet et al.

View output View publication

Contains: Publication open access

Last modified: 24/01/2019